Successful term pregnancy in a patient with acute portal vein thrombosis following in vitro fertilization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Assisted reproductive technology (ART) procedures such as in vitro fertilization (IVF) can be complicated by both arterial and venous thromboembolic events. Acute portal vein thrombosis complicating IVF is particularly rare, with only one previously reported case in the literature. This thrombotic event is typically associated with various abdominal pathologies or observed in patients with thrombophilic conditions. However, IVF increases the global risk of a venous thromboembolic event by 10-fold. In this case report, we describe a 40-year-old woman who underwent IVF treatment and subsequently developed acute portal vein thrombosis with superimposed septicaemia. Despite her severe illness, the patient was found to have a viable early pregnancy during her hospital admission. She was treated with intravenous antibiotics and therapeutic anticoagulation and discharged 18 days after initial presentation. Anticoagulation was continued throughout her pregnancy without complication and the patient went on to deliver a healthy term female. Successful pregnancy distinguishes this unique case from the other reported case of acute portal vein thrombosis secondary to IVF in the literature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".