MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2800520079 · doi:10.1002/nem.2022

DSSDN: Demand‐supply based load balancing in Software‐Defined Wide‐Area Networks

2018· article· en· W2800520079 on OpenAlex
Kshira Sagar Sahoo, Mayank Tiwary, Bibhudatta Sahoo, Ratnakar Dash, Kshirasagar Naik

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Network Management · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceOpenFlowController (irrigation)Software-defined networkingLoad balancing (electrical power)TraverseQuality of serviceComputer networkDistributed computing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary One of the unexplored research areas in Software Defined Networks (SDN) is load balancing of control messages ( e.g . p a c k e t _ i n ) among distributed controllers in Wide Area Networks. In SDN, on every unsuccessful match in the flow table for the incoming traffic flows, the switch sends p a c k e t _ i n to the controller for further action against the traffic flow. The p a c k e t _ i n messages are one of the major contributors of the control request (load) received by the controller. When it exceeds a certain threshold limit, the response time for the control request increases nonlinearly due to the over CPU utilization and congestion. When the controller gets overloaded, typically the OpenFlow‐enabled Devices (OFDevices) are migrated from the current controller to another under loaded controller domain. This migration might cause large degradation of end users' QoS metrics. To resolve this issue, we introduce basic demand and supply curve based DSSDN, a new load balancing method that utilizes the load factors of Software Defined Wide Area Networks controllers. This method selects the OFDevice which causes maximum load on the controller and traversing minimum users traffic through it. The Karush‐Kuhn‐Tucker conditions are employed during the optimal controller selection by the OFDevices to improve the response time effectively. During implementation, virtual threads running on the controller representing the OFDevices are used to take the optimal decision instead of actual OFDevices. The experimental results show that during migration, the DSSDN stabilizes the load hikes, improves QoS, and increase the end users' utility without much disruptions in the network state.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.863
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it