Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les récits de voyage invitent le lecteur « à opérer un retour sur Soi grâce à un détour par l’Autre ». Pourtant, et c’est ce que nous démontrons dans cet article, certains voyageurs n’arrivent pas à relativiser la culture d’autrui et d’opérer ce retour sur Soi. En analysant en particulier les sujets tabous de la nudité et de l’anthropophagie dans les œuvres d’André Thevet, Jean de Léry, Gabriel Sagard et Marie de l’Incarnation, nous tâchons d’identifier si l’auteur propose à son lecteur un refus ou une réflexion. Alors que certains auteurs sont capables d’imaginer des parallèles entre la culture indigène et française, d’autres ressentent du mépris face à une société différente et la rejettent. Nous réévaluons donc comment ses perspectives se manifestent sous des formes variées sur le plan narratif et énonciatif afin de mieux cerner la représentation historique du Nouveau Monde.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.029 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".