MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2800587914 · doi:10.1016/j.yexcr.2018.04.017

FoxJ1 regulates spinal cord development and is required for the maintenance of spinal cord stem cell potential

2018· article· en· W2800587914 on OpenAlexafffund
Xiaofei Li, Elisa M. Floriddia, Konstantinos Toskas, Chaima Chalfouh, Axel Honoré, Anne Aumont, Nicolas Vallières, Steve Lacroix, Karl J. L. Fernandes, Nicolas Guérout, Fanie Barnabé‐Heider

Bibliographic record

VenueExperimental Cell Research · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRenal and related cancers
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalUniversité de Montréal
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchRégion NormandieVetenskapsrådetStiftelsen för Strategisk ForskningKarolinska InstitutetEuropean Regional Development FundEuropean CommissionTore Nilsons Stiftelse för Medicinsk ForskningÅke Wiberg StiftelseBarncancerfondenCanada Research ChairsStiftelsen för Strategisk ForskningChristopher and Dana Reeve Foundation
KeywordsBiologyNeural stem cellProgenitor cellCell biologyEmbryonic stem cellProgenitorStem cellCell fate determinationSpinal cordNeuroscienceFate mappingTranscription factorGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Development of the spinal cord requires dynamic and tightly controlled expression of numerous transcription factors. Forkhead Box protein J1 (FoxJ1) is a transcription factor involved in ciliogenesis and is specifically expressed in ependymal cells (ECs) in the adult central nervous system. However, using FoxJ1 fate-mapping mouse lines, we observed that FoxJ1 is also transiently expressed by the progenitors of other neural subtypes during development. Moreover, using a knock-in mouse line, we discovered that FoxJ1 is essential for embryonic progenitors to follow a normal developmental trajectory. FoxJ1 loss perturbed embryonic progenitor proliferation and cell fate determination, and resulted in formation of adult ECs having impaired stem cell potential and an inability to respond to spinal cord injury in both male and female animals. Thus, our study uncovers unexpected developmental functions of FoxJ1 in cell fate determination of subsets of neural cells and suggests that FoxJ1 is critical for maintaining the stem cell potential of ECs into adulthood.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.391

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExperimental Cell ResearchSame topicRenal and related cancersFrench-language works237,207