MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2800600412 · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsy061.857

0858 Teenage Girls Report Higher Impact Of Sleepiness During School And Personal Activities Than Teenage Boys

2018· article· en· W2800600412 on OpenAlexaff
Pascale Gaudreault, Frédérick Michaud, Isabelle Green‐Demers, Geneviève Forest

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicHealth and Well-being Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Outaouais
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyDevelopmental psychologyClinical psychologyPediatricsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Researchers have shown that during adolescence, sleep goes through modifications, such as a delay in the sleep-wake patterns. This comes into conflict with the fixed schedules imposed by social and school demands and therefore has an influence on teenagers’ sleepiness and daytime functioning. Whether boys and girls report similar negative impact of sleep disturbances on their daytime functioning is examined in the present study. 731 adolescents (311 boys; 420 girls; 13–17,5y; grade 9–11) completed a questionnaire among which were questions on sleep and daytime functioning: 1) difficulties staying awake during class in the morning, (2) during class in the afternoon, and (3) after class while doing their homework; (4) being too tired to do activities with their friends, (5) missing school because of being too tired; (6) falling asleep during class; (7) feeling less motivated in school because of their poor sleep; (8) consuming coffee or energy drinks to compensate for their daytime sleepiness; and (9) taking naps during weekends. Items were answered on a 7 point Likert scale (1=never; 7=often). Gender differences were assessed using t-tests. Teenage girls reported more difficulties staying awake during class in the morning (t(723)=-3.95, p<.001), during class in the afternoon (t(720)=-3.98,p<.001), and during homework (t(720)=-4.11, p<.001) than boys. They also reported feeling too tired to do activities with their friends (t(721)=-3.40, p=.001), missing school because of being too tired (t(719.18)=-4.10, p<.001), feeling less motivated in school because of their poor sleep (t(695.93)=-4.20, p<.001), and taking naps during weekends (t(698.36)=-3.41,p=.001) more often than boys. However, there was no gender difference when it comes to using coffee or energy drinks to compensate for daytime sleepiness (t(715)=-.53; p=.60) or for falling asleep in class (t(722)=-.77; p=.44). Overall, our results show that girls reported a higher degree of interference of daytime sleepiness on multiple aspects of their school and personal activities than boys. This suggests that teenage girls may be more vulnerable to the negative impacts of sleep changes during adolescence than teenage boys. NA

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicHealth and Well-being StudiesFrench-language works237,207