MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2800607539 · doi:10.1139/tcsme-2015-0027

ADAPTIVE SLIDING-MODE CONTROL: SIMPLEX-TYPE METHOD

2015· article· en· W2800607539 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ta-Tau Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSimplexControl theory (sociology)Sliding mode controlSimplex algorithmMode (computer interface)Adaptive controlVariable structure controlNonlinear systemComputer scienceMathematicsControl (management)Mathematical optimizationPhysicsLinear programmingGeometryArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The simplex method is easy and brief for designing the sliding mode, but it also has some disadvantages. Since the control vectors are constant, the chattering phenomenon also occurs when switching control takes place in simplex-type SMC scheme. Hence, we make few modifications to the simplex method that form an irregular simplex such that it improves the choice of simplex control vector and chattering phenomenon. The irregular simplex is obtained by an adaptive control law. The stabilization of a nonlinear multi-input system by using adaptive control based on simplex-type sliding-mode control philosophy is examined in this paper. The adaptive law and stabilization theorem are proposed and proved. The simulation results demonstrate that the simplex-type adaptive sliding-mode control proposed in this paper is a good solution to the chattering problem in the simplex sliding-mode control.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical EngineeringSame topicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear SystemsFrench-language works237,207