Développement local et stratégie globale de deux multinationales de l’aluminium au XX e siècle : Alcan et Pechiney
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Financé par l’Agence nationale de la recherche (ANR), le projet Fralubec a réalisé une histoire parallèle de Pechiney et d’Alcan autour de trois axes de recherche : stratégies croisées de deux multinationales de l’aluminium – entre concurrence et coopération – ; entreprises de l’aluminium et territoires des vallées ; pratiques de gestion et émergence de modèles de cultures organisationnelles dans la gouvernance des installations des deux multinationales. Autour de l’industrie de l’aluminium, une coopération franco-québécoise fructueuse a permis de mener à bien de manière systématique une approche d’histoire comparée et, grâce à elle, de progresser dans la connaissance des firmes, de leurs territoires et de leurs hommes. De la confrontation des démarches a résulté un affinement méthodologique tandis que les résultats scientifiques obtenus ont dépassé les espérances compte tenu des modestes moyens humains et financiers engagés.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".