MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2800688199 · doi:10.1101/315739

Identification of TEX101 functional interactome through proteomic measurement of human spermatozoa homozygous for the missense variant rs35033974

2018· preprint· en· W2800688199 on OpenAlexaff
Christina Schiza, Dimitrios Korbakis, Keith Jarvi, Eleftherios P. Diamandis, Andrei P. Drabovich

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2018
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research InstituteUniversity of TorontoMount Sinai Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologySpermProteomicsGene knockdownMale infertilityMissense mutationGerm cellInfertilityPopulationOocyteBiomarkerInteractomeProteomeAndrologyGeneticsCell biologyPhenotypeGeneEmbryoMedicinePregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SUMMARY TEX101 is a testis-specific cell-surface protein expressed exclusively in the male germ cells and a validated biomarker of male infertility. Mouse TEX101 was found essential for male fertility, and was suggested to function as a cell surface chaperone involved in maturation of proteins required for sperm migration and sperm-oocyte interaction. However, the precise functional role of human TEX101 is not known and cannot be studied in vitro due to the lack of human germ cell lines. Here, we genotyped 386 healthy fertile men and sub-fertile patients for a common and potentially deleterious missense variant rs35033974 of TEX101 , and identified 52 heterozygous and 4 homozygous patients. We then discovered by targeted proteomics that the variant allele rs35033974 was associated with near-complete degradation (>97%) of the corresponding G99V TEX101 form, and suggested that spermatozoa of homozygous patients could serve as a knockdown model to study TEX101 function in humans. Differential proteomic profiling with label-free quantification measured 8,046 proteins in spermatozoa of eight men and identified 8 cell-surface and 9 secreted testis-specific proteins significantly down-regulated in four patients homozygous for rs35033974. Substantially reduced levels of testis-specific cell-surface proteins potentially involved in sperm migration and sperm-oocyte fusion (including LY6K and ADAM29) were confirmed by targeted proteomics and western blotting assays. Since recent population-scale genomic data revealed homozygous fathers with biological children, rs35033974 is not a single pathogenic factor of male infertility in humans. However, median TEX101 levels in seminal plasma were found 5-fold lower ( P =0.0005) in heterozygous than in wild-type men of European ancestry. We conclude that spermatozoa of rs35033974 homozygous men have substantially reduced levels of TEX101 and could be used as a model to elucidate the precise TEX101 function, which will advance biology of human reproduction. Non-standard abbreviations TEX101 Testis-expressed sequence 101 protein LY6K Lymphocyte antigen 6 complex locus K ADAM29 A disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 29 DPEP3 Dipeptidase 3 BH-adjusted t-test Benjamini-Hochberg-adjusted t-test FDR False discovery rate FWHM Full width at half maximum GPI Glycosylphosphatidylinositol LC-MS/MS liquid chromatography - tandem mass spectrometry LFQ Label-free quantification MS Mass spectrometry mAb Monoclonal antibody MWU Mann Whitney Unpaired t-test PRM Parallel reaction monitoring ROC AUC Receiver operating characteristic area under the curve SCX strong cation exchange chromatography SP seminal plasma SNV Single nucleotide variation SRM Selected reaction monitoring WT wild-type

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicGenetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal AbnormalitiesFrench-language works237,207