MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2800691692 · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsy061.290

0291 Degraded Fractal Activity Regulation Predicts Elevated Risk of Alzheimer’s Disease in the Elderly

2018· article· en· W2800691692 on OpenAlexaff
Peng Li, Lei Yu, Andrew Lim, Aron S. Buchman, Frank A. J. L. Scheer, Steven A. Shea, Julie A. Schneider, David A. Bennett, Kun Hu

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHealth, Environment, Cognitive Aging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCircadian rhythmCognitionAlzheimer's diseaseCognitive declineEffects of sleep deprivation on cognitive performanceAudiologyPsychologyNeuropsychologyMedicineInternal medicineDementiaGerontologyDiseaseNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Healthy physiological systems exhibit fractal regulation, generating similar fluctuation patterns in physiological outputs across different time scales from seconds to hours. Evidence indicates a mechanistic link between fractal regulation and sleep/circadian control, both degraded with aging and in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Recent studies showed that sleep and circadian disturbances may be early signs of AD. We tested whether degraded fractal regulation predicts AD risk. We examined 1,097 older adults (844 females) in the Rush Memory and Aging Project who have undergone annual neuropsychological tests to assess their cognitive status for up to 11 years. These subjects were non-demented and aged between 65–100 years old at baseline. Motor activity was monitored on the wrist continuously for up to 10 days at baseline. Detrended fluctuation analysis was performed to obtain a metric α that quantifies fractal temporal correlations of motor activity at time scales ~0.1–1.5h. Cox proportional hazards models were performed to examine the associations of α with incident AD and incident mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Linear mixed effect models were used to examine the associations of α with cognitive decline. Of the 1,097 participants, 220 developed AD (4.6 ± 2.8 [SD] years after baseline). For 1-SD decrease in α (~0.06), the risk of AD increased by 1.31-fold (95% CI: 1.15–1.49, p<0.0001) after adjusting for age, sex, and education. The association remained after further accounting for physical activity, sleep fragmentation, or stability of daily activity rhythms. Consistently, with 1-SD decrease in α, the risk of MCI increased by 1.15-fold (95% CI: 1.02–1.29, p=0.018); and the annual cognitive decline was accelerated by 12.5% that was equivalent to the effect of being 2 years older. Degraded fractal regulation predicts increased AD risk that is independent of other AD risk factors including age, physical activity, sleep, and stability of daily activity rhythms. This work was supported by NIH grants R01AG048108, R00HL102241, P01AG009975, R01AG017917, and R01NS078009.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.120
Threshold uncertainty score0.817

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicHealth, Environment, Cognitive AgingFrench-language works237,207