MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2800695798 · doi:10.29173/mruhr463

Skin and Bones: The Decimation of the Plains Buffalo

2018· article· en· W2800695798 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Nancy Kimberley Phillips

Bibliographic record

VenueMount Royal Undergraduate Humanities Review (MRUHR) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousSubsistence agricultureThreatened speciesEthnologyGeographyHistoryDevelopment economicsPolitical scienceEcologyArchaeologyAgricultureBiologyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the 16th century, North America (Turtle Island) was home to 25 to 30 million buffalo roaming freely on the Great Plains, but by the end of the late 19th century only a few hundred remained. After European contact, a combination of ecological changes, species pressure and disease created tension between the buffalo herds and threatened their survival. However, the dramatic decrease associated with the buffalo is ultimately attributed to human agency. Unofficial military policy, sport-hunting, and a capitalistic hunger for resources brought the once plentiful herds to near extinction in just a few decades. The decimation of the buffalo was encouraged by both the American and Canadian governments because it was viewed as a solution to the “Indian problem” – Indigenous people were thought to be easier to control if their main source of subsistence had vanished. Fundamentally, the means by which the buffalo were slowly eradicated from the Great Plains had a profound influence on the lives of Indigenous peoples and offers an insight into Indigenous-Settler relations during the 19th century.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.811
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMount Royal Undergraduate Humanities Review (MRUHR)Same topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207