Development of the Institutional Structure of the Economy of Rankin Inlet, Nunavut, Canada: Inuit Strategic Participation in Commercial Opportunities.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This dissertation aims to provide insight into the development of the institutional structure of the economy of Rankin Inlet, Kivalliq Region, Nunavut, Canada from its inception (1953-1957) to the period following the creation of the Territory of Nunavut in 1999.Its analysis is informed by the ideas of Karl Polanyi, who argues in The Great List of Acronyms AEM -Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.BNA Act -British North America Act DEW -Distant Early Warning DIAND -Department of Indian and Northern Affairs DIO -Designated Inuit Organization DNANR -Department of Northern Affairs and National Resources EAC -Eskimo Affairs Committee COPE -Committee for Original Peoples' Entitlement FPIC -Free, Prior and Informed Consent DIO -Designated Inuit Organization GN -Government of Nunavut GNWT -Government of the Northwest Territories HBC -Hudson's Bay Company HTO -Hunters and Trappers Organizations IBA -Impact Benefit Agreement IIBA -Inuit Impact Benefit Agreement IQ -Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit ITC -Inuit Tapirisat of Canada ITK -Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami KAF -Kivalliq Arctic Foods KRP -Keewatin Rehabilitation Project NHSP -Nunavut Harvester Support Program NIC -Nunavut Implementation Commission NIRB -Nunavut Impact Review Board NLCA -Nunavut Land Claims Agreement NPA -Nunavut Political Accord NRNM -North Rankin Nickel Mines NSO -Northern Service Officer NTI -Nunavut Tunngavik Inc. NWT -Northwest Territories NWMB -Nunavut Wildlife Management Board NWMP -North West Mounted Police NTYB -Northwest Territories and Yukon Branch of the Department of Mines and Resources RWB -Regional Wildlife Boards SLiCA -Survey of Living Conditions in the Arctic SPR -Social Protection Response TFN -Tunngavik Federation of Nunavut UK -United Kingdom US -United States USD -United States Dollar WWI -World War One WWII -World War Two 44 Ibid.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".