MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2800714754 · doi:10.1109/tcyb.2018.2829440

Variational Bayesian Approach for Causality and Contemporaneous Correlation Features Inference in Industrial Process Data

2018· article· en· W2800714754 on OpenAlexafffund
Rahul Raveendran, Biao Huang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFault Detection and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlberta Innovates
KeywordsBayesian inferenceInferenceMultivariate statisticsCausality (physics)Computer scienceEconometricsCausal modelBayesian probabilitySeries (stratigraphy)Autoregressive modelMathematicsArtificial intelligenceMachine learningStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a hybrid model is proposed to simultaneously mine causal connections and features responsible for contemporaneous correlations in a multivariate process. The model is developed by combining the vector auto-regressive exogenous model and the factor analysis model. The parameters of the resulting model are regularized using the hierarchical prior distributions for pruning insignificant/irrelevant ones from the model. It is then estimated under the variational Bayesian expectation maximization framework. The estimation is initiated with a complex model which is then systematically reduced to a simpler model that retains only the parameters corresponding to significant causal connections and contemporaneous correlations. Model reduction is carried out through a series of deterministic jumps from complex models to simpler models using a relevance criterion. The approach is illustrated with a number of simulated examples and an industrial case study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on CyberneticsSame topicFault Detection and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207