MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2800738891 · doi:10.1139/tcsme-2016-0074

SUB-OPTIMAL ALGORITHM SECOND-ORDER SLIDING MODE CONTROL FOR A SYNCHRONOUS RELUCTANCE MOTOR SPEED DRIVE

2016· article· en· W2800738891 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Huann‐Keng Chiang, Wenbin Lin

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSensorless Control of Electric Motors
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinistry of Science and Technology, Taiwan
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Switched reluctance motorSliding mode controlNonlinear systemController (irrigation)Electronic speed controlMode (computer interface)Computer scienceReluctance motorMagnetic reluctanceControl engineeringVariable structure controlControl (management)EngineeringRotor (electric)MagnetPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A sub-optimal algorithm second-order sliding mode controller (SOSMC) was presented for a synchronous reluctance motor (SynRM) speed drive. SOSMC is an effective tool for the control of uncertain nonlinear systems since it overcomes the main chattering drawback of conventional sliding mode control. The practical implementation of SOSMC has simple control laws and assures an improvement in sliding accuracy with respect to conventional sliding mode control. This paper proposes a control scheme based on sub-optimal algorithm SOSMC. The proposed SOSMC is robust against motor parameter variations and mitigates chattering phenomenon. Experiments were conducted to validate the proposed method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical EngineeringSame topicSensorless Control of Electric MotorsFrench-language works237,207