MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2800750752 · doi:10.7202/1044162ar

L’expérience de soi et des autres avant et après la mort parmi les Wayuu et les Dènès Tha

2018· article· fr· W2800750752 on OpenAlex
Jean‐Guy A. Goulet

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontières · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsSaint Paul University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans God is Red , Vine Deloria Jr. soutient que dans les religions basées sur des révélations « la croyance se substitute à l’expérience vécue ». Cette dernière est pourtant centrale dans les traditions religieuses amérindiennes pour lesquelles la mort n’est pas anticipée avec crainte, mais comme accomplissement de sa destinée. Sur la base d’enquêtes de terrain parmi les Wayuu de la Colombie en Amérique du Sud et parmi les Dènès Tha du nord-ouest albertain, cet article démontre que chez ces deux peuples qui privilégient l’expérience personnelle comme mode d’appréhension du monde, la manière dont on envisage sa mort et la mort d’autrui diffère néanmoins de façon significative selon des cosmologies et des ontologies distinctes. Chez ces deux peuples, toutefois, une attention particulière est accordée aux rêves qui sont l’occasion de rencontres avec les défunts et deviennent ainsi une forme d’intersubjectivité qui fait le pont entre l’ici et l’après la mort.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.906
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0060.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it