MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

261 Secukinumab 150 mg provides sustained improvements in the signs and symptoms of active ankylosing spondylitis with high retention rate: 4-year results from the Phase 3 trial, MEASURE 2

2019· article· en· W2800761096 on OpenAlexaff
Helena Marzo‐Ortega, Joachim Sieper, Alan Kivitz, Richardo Blanco, Martin Cohen, Eumorphia-Maria Delicha, Susanne Rohrer, Hanno B. Richards

Bibliographic record

VenueLara D. Veeken · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSecukinumabAnkylosing spondylitisMeasure (data warehouse)Physical therapyInternal medicineArthritisPsoriatic arthritis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Secukinumab (SEC), a fully human monoclonal antibody that neutralises interleukin-17A, has shown significant and sustained improvement in the signs and symptoms of active ankylosing spondylitis (AS) through 3 years in the MEASURE 2 study (NCT01649375). Objectives: To report the longer-term (4 year) efficacy and safety of subcutaneous (s.c.) SEC 150 mg in the MEASURE 2 study. Methods: AS patients (n = 219) were randomised to receive s.c. SEC 150 mg (approved dose), 75 mg or placebo (PBO) at baseline (BL), weeks (weeks) 1, 2 and 3, and every 4 weeks from week 4. At week 16, PBO-treated patients were re-randomised to receive SEC 150/75 mg. Efficacy results are reported for pts initially randomised to SEC 150 mg and those who switched from PBO to SEC 150 mg at week 16. Safety analyses included all patients who received ≥1 dose of SEC. Results are reported as observed. Results: The retention rate from week 16 to 208 was 85% (85/100) for SEC 150 mg. Sustained improvements were observed with SEC 150 mg across all endpoints through 4 years (Table 1). These improvements were maintained regardless of prior exposure to anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) therapy; greater responses were demonstrated in anti-TNF-naive patients. Over the entire study period, the mean exposure (±standard deviation [SD]) to SEC was 1189.3±452.9 days. Exposure-adjusted incidence rates (per 100 patient-years) with any SEC dose for selected adverse events were: serious infections/infestations (1.5), Candida infections (1.2), Crohn’s disease (0.6), major adverse cardiovascular events (0.6), uveitis (0.6), and malignant/unspecified tumours (0.4). Conclusion: SEC 150 mg provided sustained improvement in signs, symptoms and physical function in patients with AS through 4 years of treatment, with 85% retention rate. The safety profile of SEC remained favourable and was consistent with previous reports. Clinical improvements with SEC 150 mg at Wks 52 and 208 Includes PBO switchers. Data are reported as observed. ASAS, Assessment in Spondyloarthritis International Society; BASDAI, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index; IR, inadequate response; PBO, placebo; SD, standard deviation; SEC, secukinumab; SF-36 PCS, Short Form 36 Health Survey Physical Component Summary; TNF, tumour necrosis factor; Wk, week. Disclosures: H. Marzo-Ortega: Member of speakers’ bureau; H. M. participated in speaker bureaus for: AbbVie, Celgene, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB. Grants/research support; H. M. received grant/research support from: Celgene and Janssen. J. Sieper: Consultancies; J. S. consulted for: AbbVie, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB. Member of speakers’ bureau; J. S. participated in speaker bureaus for: AbbVie, Merck, Pfizer and UCB. Grants/research support; J. S. received grant/research support from: AbbVie, Merck and Pfizer. A. Kivitz: Consultancies; A. K. consulted for: AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingeleheim, Celgene and Genetech. Grants/research support; A. K. received grant/research support from: Altoona Centre for Clinical Research. R. Blanco: Consultancies; R. B. consulted for: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Pfizer and Roche. Member of speakers’ bureau; R. B. participated in speaker bureaus for: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Pfizer and Roche. Grants/research support; R. B. received grant/research support from: AbbVie, MSD and Roche. M. Cohen: Consultancies; M. C. consulted for: AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Paladin, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi and UCB. E. Delicha: Other; M. D. is an employee of Novartis. S. Rohrer: Other; R. is an employee of Novartis. H. Richards: Other; H. R. is an employee of Novartis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLara D. VeekenSame topicSpondyloarthritis Studies and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207