MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2800776962 · doi:10.22323/1.282.0540

Vus from tau decay data

2017· article· en· W2800776962 on OpenAlexaff
Kim Maltman, Renwick J. Hudspith, Randy Lewis, J. M. Zanotti

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of 38th International Conference on High Energy Physics — PoS(ICHEP2016) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUnitarityPhysicsParticle physicsAlephHadronDimension (graph theory)Consistency (knowledge bases)SigmaNuclear physicsQuantum mechanicsDiscrete mathematicsCombinatoricsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We revisit the conventional implementation of the determination of $V_{us}$ via flavor-breaking (FB) finite-energy sum rule (FESR) analyses of inclusive hadronic $\tau$ decay data, which is known to produce results $>3\sigma$ low compared to determinations from kaon physics and the expectations of three-family unitarity. We show that this implementation fails self-consistency tests, and that the source of this problem is a breakdown of assumptions concerning the treatment of higher dimension OPE contributions. We then provide an alternate implementation of the FB FESR approach which cures these problems. Lattice data for the relevant flavor-breaking correlator combination is also employed to clarify the treatment of the slowly-converging dimension $2$ OPE contribution to the relevant sum rules and quantify the associated truncation uncertainty. We implement this new approach using ALEPH non-strange data, and a combination of ALEPH, BaBar and Belle strange $\tau$ decay data. Normalizing the exclusive $\tau\rightarrow K^-\pi^0\nu_\tau$ mode component of the inclusive strange decay distribution using the recent preliminary BaBar result for the corresponding branching fraction we find a result, $V_{us}=0.2228(23)_{exp}(6)_{th}$, in excellent agreement with the results of $K_{\ell 3}$-based analyses, and in agreement within errors with three-family-unitarity expectations, thus resolving the long-standing inclusive $\tau$ $V_{us}$ puzzle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of 38th International Conference on High Energy Physics — PoS(ICHEP2016)Same topicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studiesFrench-language works237,207