Achieving the Right to Strike: Ontario Teachers’ Unions and Professionalist Ideology
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
rior to 1975 and the passage of the School Boards and Teachers Collective Negotiations Act (Bill 100) teachers ’ unions in Ontario did not have the right to legally strike. From 1918 until 1975 teachers had employed moral suasion or occasionally mid-year resignations to convince boards of education to move towards the teachers ’ position at the bargaining table. Historically these conditions resulted in teachers ’ unions in Ontario being decidedly non-militant and seldom invoking job action of any sort. Teachers’ unions had shied away from aligning themselves with other unionized workers and had refrained from employing an ideology of labour solidarity to bring their members to the picket line. The sudden growth in teachers ’ union strength during the late 1960s and early 1970s resulted in the William Davis Conservative government attempting to contain teachers ’ militancy. In response union leaders turned to an ideology of professionalism to mobilize their membership and won the right to strike. This paper will review the historical development of professionalism as a
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it