Quantitation of Sialic Acids in Infant Formulas by Liquid Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry: An Assessment of Different Protein Sources and Discovery of New Analogues
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Glycosidically bound, but not free, dietary sialic acids are used for the biosynthesis of new glycoconjugates in humans, making the quantitation of these two forms in infant food sources important, as in neonates the demand for sialic acid may exceed the de novo biosynthetic supply. Here, a rapid high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry method was developed to identify and quantitate glycosidically bound and free sialic acids in infant formulas. The sialic acid contents of eight commercially available infant formulas with varying protein source or manufacturer were investigated. The formula protein sources (whey vs casein) did not have a large impact on the ratios of free to bound sialic acids, nor did protein hydrolysis or sample form (solid vs liquid). Hydrolyzed bovine whey protein-based formulas were found to contain the highest amount of the most abundant human sialic acid, 5- N-acetylneuraminic acid (Neu5Ac). O-Acetylated Neu5Ac was quantified in all formulas tested and, for the first time, 2-keto-3-deoxy-d-glycero-d-galacto-nononic acid (Kdn) was detected in several infant formulas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".