Shear/rotation competition during the roll-up of acoustically excited shear layers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Naturally developing and acoustically excited shear layers at the Reynolds numbers $Re_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D703}_{0}}=U\unicode[STIX]{x1D703}_{0}/\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}=85{-}945$ are studied using the hot-wire (HW) anemometry and particle image velocimetry (PIV), with a focus on the shear/rotation competition during the initial Kelvin–Helmholtz (KH) roll-up. Velocity spectra and the spatial linear stability (LST) analysis characterize the fundamental ( $f_{n}$ ) and its subharmonic ( $f_{n}/2$ ) mode interacting due to the vortex pairing. For $276\leqslant Re_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D703}_{0}}\leqslant 780$ , the root-mean-square (r.m.s.) of the streamwise turbulence intensity shows a double-peaking phenomenon, i.e. major and minor peaks of the $u_{rms}$ coexist towards the high-speed (HS) and the low-speed (LS) sides, respectively. The single/double-peaked $u_{rms}$ profiles are found to be correlated with the scattered/organized distribution of the shear/rotation, demonstrating a transitioning character with the downstream distance, $Re_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D703}_{0}}$ and the upstream turbulence levels. The rotating vortex cores and the corresponding peripheral shear regions, demonstrate the phase reversal of the velocity fluctuations with respect to the HS and the LS sides. Excitation at $f_{n}$ increases the vortex count by 21 %, advances the location of the first KH roll-up and hence also the minor peak formation location. Due to the enhanced pairing at the $f_{n}/2$ forcing, the vortex count reduces by 23 %. Before merging into the downstream rotation core, the upstream vortex is shifted towards the HS side and the major peak is accordingly augmented. Actuation advances the transition to the nonlinear state, as well as the saturation of the amplification factor. The volumetric topologies of the shear/rotation loops tracked in consecutive phases during the period of the acoustic excitation, separate from the edge and grow in time–space due to the viscous diffusion. The shearing and rotating loops are found to be associated with the thinning (elongation) and expansion (accumulation) of the vorticity, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".