MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2800903821 · doi:10.1139/bcb-2017-0297

Nonhistone targets of KAT2A and KAT2B implicated in cancer biology

2018· review· en· W2800903821 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Emma Bondy‐Chorney, Alix Denoncourt, Yuka Sai, Michael Downey

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry and Cell Biology · 2018
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPeptidase Inhibition and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAcetylationBiologyNon-histone proteinAcetyltransferasesHistoneContext (archaeology)LysineComputational biologyHistone AcetyltransferasesFunction (biology)BiochemistryGeneticsDNAAmino acidGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lysine acetylation is a critical post-translation modification that can impact a protein's localization, stability, and function. Originally thought to only occur on histones, we now know thousands of nonhistone proteins are also acetylated. In conjunction with many other proteins, lysine acetyltransferases (KATs) are incorporated into large protein complexes that carry out these modifications. In this review we focus on the contribution of two KATs, KAT2A and KAT2B, and their potential roles in the development and progression of cancer. Systems biology demands that we take a broad look at protein function rather than focusing on individual pathways or targets. As such, in this review we examine KAT2A/2B-directed nonhistone protein acetylations in cancer in the context of the 10 "Hallmarks of Cancer", as defined by Hanahan and Weinberg. By focusing on specific examples of KAT2A/2B-directed acetylations with well-defined mechanisms or strong links to a cancer phenotype, we aim to reinforce the complex role that these enzymes play in cancer biology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations52
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemistry and Cell BiologySame topicPeptidase Inhibition and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207