PURE SQUEEZE FILM BEHAVIOR OF LONG JOURNAL BEARINGS WITH COUPLE STRESS FLUIDS UNDER DYNAMIC LOADING
Bibliographic record
Abstract
On the basis of microcontinuum theory, a theoretical analysis of pure squeeze film behavior of journal bearings with couple stress lubricants operating under a dynamic load is presented. To account for the effects of couple stresses arising from the lubricant blended with various additives, the modified Reynolds equation governing the film pressure is obtained from Stokes equations of motion. Various bearing characteristics for long bearings are then calculated. According to the results obtained, the influence of couple stresses on the dynamic squeeze film motion is apparent and not negligible. Comparing with the Newtonian-lubricant case, the effects of coupe stresses provide and enhancement in the film pressure as well as a reduction in the velocity of the journal center; consequently, the maximum eccentricity ratio of the journal center is decreased. On the whole, the bearing lubricated with couple stress fluid signifies and improvement in the dynamic squeeze film performance and results in longer bearing life.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".