MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2800919198 · doi:10.1093/eurpub/cky047.126

4.2-O2Using the Population structure from the All Ireland Traveller Health Study 2007-2010 to facilitate comparison with other Indigenous Ethnic Minority populations globally

2018· article· en· W2800919198 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
B. Quirke, Mirjam M. Heinen, Leslie Daly, Cecily Kelleher

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Public Health · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicGlobal Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousEthnic groupGeographyPopulationDemographySociologyAnthropologyBiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Indigenous ethnic minority populations globally experience high levels of mortality, low life expectancy and high fertility rates, reflected in their population pyramids compared to national populations. Irish Travellers are a centuries-old indigenous ethnic minority, of nomadic tradition, on the island of Ireland. The All-Ireland Traveller Health Study (AITHS) was a comprehensive census survey of self-identified Travellers. Our objective was to compare the Traveller population structures and Dependency Ratios with those of Inuit in Canada, and Aborigines in Australia. Methods: We employed archived data of 7042 AITHS Traveller families and data collected from the Irish Central Statistics Office (historic data 1846-1951, modern 1996 onwards); Health Research Board (1987); Statistics Canada (2006, 2011); Australian Bureau of Statistics (2006, 2011) to prepare comparative population pyramids and estimate dependency ratios. Results: In both 1987 and 2007 the Traveller populations show patterns more comparable to developing countries than to the general Irish population. All three ethnic minority populations considered had under 25year age-groups 2 to 3 times higher than general National populations: Travellers 63% Vs 35% Irish; Inuit 56% Vs 31% Canadian; Aborigines 56% Vs 29% Australian. Percentages over 65 years were 2 to 3 times lower; Travellers 3% Vs 13% Irish; Inuit 4% Vs 13% Canadian, Aborigines 3% Vs 14% Australian. The overall dependency ratios (0-14+ over 65/15-64) were 82% for Travellers Vs 22% Irish; Inuit 64% Vs 45% Canadian; Aborigines 64% Vs 47% Australian. Conclusions: Ethnic minorities living in different continents with different socio-cultural and historical contexts, share nonetheless similar health inequalities reflected in their population pyramids. Contemporary Irish Traveller population profiles contrast both with the Irish general population currently and with historical census records. Main message: Population pyramids for ethnic minority populations over time can assist with monitoring the achievement of equality of opportunity in health, education, employment and accommodation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.175
Threshold uncertainty score0.349

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.239
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.131 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Public Health→Same topicGlobal Public Health Policies and Epidemiology→French-language works237,207→