MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2800965467 · doi:10.1117/12.2304896

Deep learning for face recognition at a distance

2018· article· en· W2800965467 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFace recognition and analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Moncton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceFace (sociological concept)Facial recognition systemDeep learningArchitectureComputer visionPattern recognition (psychology)Convolutional neural networkGenerative grammarGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Face recognition is a research area that has been widely studied by the computer vision community in the past years. Most of the work deals with close frontal images of the face where facial structures can be easily distinguished. Little work deals with recognizing faces at a distance, where faces are at a very low resolution and barely distinguishable. In this work, we present a deep learning architecture that can be used to enhance lower resolution facial images captured at a distance. The proposed framework uses Deep Convolutional Generative Adversarial Networks (DCGAN). The proposed architecture works well even in the presence of a small number of images for learning. The new enhanced images are then sent to a face recognition algorithm for classification. The proposed framework outperforms classical enhancement techniques and leads to an increase in the face recognition performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.991
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFace recognition and analysisFrench-language works237,207