Thresholds of photolysis of O<sub>2</sub> and of formation of O<sub>3</sub> from O<sub>2</sub> dispersed in solid neon
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Irradiation of O2 dispersed in solid Ne with ultraviolet light produced infrared absorption lines of O3 and emission lines from atomic O (1D2 → 3P1,2), molecular O2 (A' 3Δu → X 3Σg) and radical OH (A 2Σ+ → X 2ΠI) in the visible and near-ultraviolet regions. The threshold wavelength for the formation of O3 was determined to be 200 ± 4 nm, corresponding to energy 6.20 ± 0.12 eV, which is hence the threshold for dissociation of O2. The thresholds of emission from excited O (1D2), O2 (A' 3Δu) and OH (A 2Σ+) were all observed to be 200 ± 4 nm, the same as for the formation of O3 in this photochemical system. The results indicate that, once O3 was generated, it was readily photolyzed to produce the long-lived atom O (1D2). Further reactions of O (1D2) with O3 produced excited O2 (A' 3Δu); reaction with water yielded radical OH (A 2Σ+). These results enhance our understanding of the evolution of the transformation of oxygen and open a window for the understanding of complicated processes in the solid phase.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".