MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Barbados in the Atlantic World

2018· reference-entry· en· W2801042718 on OpenAlexaff
Justin Roberts

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereference-entry
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCaribbean history, culture, and politics
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAtlantic WorldOceanographyGeographyHistoryFisheryGeologyAncient historyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Barbados, settled by Europeans in 1627, was among the first permanent English colonies in the Americas, and it was where the English variant of race-based plantation slavery first took root; not surprisingly, it plays a central role in the scholarship of the Atlantic world. Although Barbados was uninhabited when the English arrived, they were certainly not the first people on the island. Arawak-speaking peoples first migrated to Barbados from South America long before 1492. The Kalinago were the last people to live on Barbados before the English arrived. The Portuguese and Spanish visited the island after 1492 but never established colonies there. The Spanish claimed that the island was uninhabited in the mid-sixteenth century. Yet, by the mid-seventeenth century, Barbados was the most densely populated and lucrative colony in the English Americas. Barbadian planters began growing sugar in the 1640s. They were innovators and they developed a proto-industrial and integrated sugar plantation system that was more productive than the sugar industry had been in Brazil. At first, planters relied on a mixture of Africans and white servants, but the Barbadian plantation model became increasingly dependent on a brutal and ruthlessly efficient system of racial slavery. The island was quickly deforested, the environment was destroyed, and the soils were degraded by sugar. Barbadians became the vanguard of expansion through the English plantation in the Americas, and they helped extend their new model of race-based plantation slavery and the legislative measures designed to entrench it to Surinam, Jamaica, Antigua, the Carolinas, and the Chesapeake. Although the island was threatened by hurricanes, the Barbadian elite benefited from fewer threats to production than the planters in other British Caribbean islands; no other European power invaded Barbados before emancipation, and there was only one major slave insurrection. After the transition to sugar, Barbados continued to have a majority black population throughout its history, but the ratio of blacks to whites was smaller than in other major British Caribbean colonies. Barbados had the only naturally reproducing slave population among all the Caribbean sugar colonies before emancipation. A Barbadian creole culture developed among the peoples of African and European descent. The white population, however, was divided into a planter elite and a marginalized poor white population. A small number of free blacks also carved out lives on the island. After emancipation in 1833, the Barbadian sugar economy recovered but the ex-slaves continued to struggle against economic and racial oppression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.566
Threshold uncertainty score0.873

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCaribbean history, culture, and politics→French-language works237,207→