MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2801043355 · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsy061.651

0652 Delayed Sleep Time In African Americans And Depression In A Community-Based Population

2018· article· en· W2801043355 on OpenAlexaff
Omavi Bailey, M.A. Sans-Fuentes, C Havens, Daniel Combs, Michael A. Grandner, C Poongkunran, Sarah Patel, Sarah Berryhill, Natalie Provencio, Stuart F. Quan, Sairam Parthasarathy

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSleep and related disorders
Canadian institutionsCanadian Sleep & Circadian Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDepression (economics)MedicineBody mass indexPopulationDemographyCircadian rhythmNon-Hispanic whitesSleep deprivationGerontologyInternal medicineEthnic group

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Experimental studies have suggested a shorter circadian period in African Americans when compared to Non-Hispanic Whites, and suggest racial differences in circadian phase shifting in such experiments. Observational studies that indicate that delayed sleep phase is associated with depression. Whether delayed sleep time is associated with depression in a community-based population and the influence of race on such an association are largely unknown. We tested the hypothesis that in a community-based population, the prevalence of delayed sleep time is greater in African Americans when compared to Whites. We also tested the hypothesis that depression is associated with delayed sleep time in a community based population. We analyzed data from the Sleep Heart Health Study, which is a large community-based sample (n=6,441). Self-reported time to fall asleep on weekdays and weekends was available for analysis. Covariates included age, sex, race, body mass index, smoking, apnea-hypopnea index, alcohol, antidepressant medications, and caffeine. Depression was defined based on participant’s response to the question, “In the past 4 weeks have you felt downhearted and blue?” and/or anti-depressants in their medication list. Delayed sleep time was defined as a usual time to fall asleep after midnight. After adjusting for covariates, weekday self-reported time to fall asleep was 26 ± 12 minutes later in African Americans when compared to Non-Hispanic whites (P=0.03). Similarly, weekend time to fall asleep was 27 ± 12 minutes later in African Americans when compared to Non-Hispanic whites (P=0.025). The proportion of individuals with delayed sleep time was greater in African Americans (33.3%) when compared to Non-Hispanic whites (18.7%; P<0.0001). After adjusting for covariates, when compared to Non-Hispanic whites, a greater proportion of African Americans had delayed sleep time (Adjusted Odds Ratio [adjOR] 2.4; 95% Confidence Interval [95%CI] 1.6, 2.6; P<0.0001). Depression was independently associated with delayed sleep time after adjusting for covariates (AdjOR 1.3; 95%CI 1.1, 1.7; P=0.012). African Americans are more likely to experience delayed sleep time when compared to Non-Hispanic Whites. Delayed sleep time was independently associated with depression. U01HL53938.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.107
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicSleep and related disordersFrench-language works237,207