Efficacy and Safety of Adalimumab Treatment in Patients with Moderate to Severe Psoriasis: A Double-Blind, Randomized Clinical Trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) is pivotal in the pathogenesis of psoriasis, an immune-mediated disease. Adalimumab is a fully human, IgG 1 monoclonal antibody that inhibits TNF-α. Objectives The aims of this study were to assess the efficacy and safety of adalimumab therapy for patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis and evaluate the duration of treatment response after withdrawal from or dosage reduction of adalimumab therapy. Methods In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis received 12-week, open-label therapy with subcutaneous adalimumab, consisting of 80 mg of adalimumab at weeks 0 and 1, followed by 40 mg weekly at weeks 2–11. At week 12, patients who had an improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score of ≥50% were randomized to blinded therapy and received either adalimumab 40 mg every other week (eow) or placebo for an additional 12 weeks. Results A total of 148 patients enrolled. Clinical response was rapid, with a PASI 50 response rate of 28% at week 2 of adalimumab therapy. At week 12, 91.9% (136/148) of patients had achieved ≥50% reduction in PASI (PASI 50) vs. baseline, 76.4% (113/148) had achieved PASI 75, and 47.3% (70/148) had achieved PASI 90. Of patients who were randomized to placebo at week 12, 30.9% (21/68) experienced a relapse (<PASI 50 improvement vs. baseline) by week 24, compared with 16.2% (11/68) of patients who received adalimumab 40 mg eow. In addition, 48.5% (33/68) of patients who were randomized to placebo at week 12 were PASI 75 responded at week 24, compared with 67.6% (46/68) of patients randomized to adalimumab 40 mg eow (p=0.032). And, 27.9% (19/68) of patients who were randomized to placebo at week 12 were PASI 90 responders at week 24, compared with 47.1% (32/68) of patients randomized to adalimumab 40 mg eow (p=0.028). Adalimumab was generally well-tolerated, and the rates of adverse events were comparable between the adalimumab and placebo groups. Conclusions Weekly adalimumab therapy rapidly improved psoriasis during an initial 12-week period. Improvement was sustained in most, but not all patients, despite dosage reduction to every other week. No patients randomized to adalimumab withdrawal (placebo at week 12) experienced rebound, and most maintained >PASI 50 improvement, relative to baseline, during the 3 months following adalimumab discontinuation. Overall, greater efficacy rates at week 24 were observed for patients randomized to continuous adalimumab therapy than for patients who were withdrawn from therapy at week 12.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".