MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2801101136 · doi:10.1139/tcsme-2005-0013

AN ADAPTIVE PROPORTIONAL NAVIGATION GUIDANCE LAW FOR INTERCEPTION OF A MANEUVERING TARGET

2005· article· en· W2801101136 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Dany Dionne, H. Michalska

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGuidance and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProportional navigationLawAccelerationControl theory (sociology)Computer scienceInterceptionArtificial intelligenceControl (management)PhysicsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new adaptive proportional navigation law for interception of a maneuvering target is presented. The approach employs a bank of guidance laws and an on-line governor to select the guidance law in effect at each time instant. The members of the bank are the proportional navigation law and a companion law suitable for a target moving with a constant acceleration. The governor is a hierarchical decision rule which uses the outputs from a maneuver detector and the available a-priori information about the expected number of evasive maneuvers. Simulation results demonstrate that the adaptive approach leads to a reduction in the miss distance as compared with cases where only a single non-adaptive guidance law is available.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical EngineeringSame topicGuidance and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207