MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2801149703 · doi:10.1139/cjp-2017-0904

Numerical simulations of MHD forced convection flow of micropolar fluid inside a right-angled triangular cavity saturated with porous medium: Effects of vertical moving wall

2018· article· en· W2801149703 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mubbashar Nazeer, Nasir Ali, Tariq Javed

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNusselt numberPrandtl numberDarcy numberStreamlines, streaklines, and pathlinesMechanicsPhysicsHartmann numberRichardson numberReynolds numberLaminar flowRayleigh numberGrashof numberClassical mechanicsNatural convectionHeat transferThermodynamicsBuoyancyTurbulence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present article explores the effects of moving lid on the forced convection flow of micropolar fluid inside a right-angle triangular cavity saturated with porous medium. The base and hypotenuse or inclined sides of the cavity are maintained at constant temperatures, while the vertical side of the enclosure is adiabatic and moving with constant velocity in upward or downward direction. The flow equations are simulated by using the robust finite element numerical technique. The pressure term from the momentum equations is eliminated by using the penalty parameter. For a consistent solution, the value of the penalty parameter is selected as 107. The simulations are performed for the cases based on the direction of moving lid. The numerical outcomes are shown in terms of streamlines, temperature contours, and local and average Nusselt numbers for sundry parameters, such as micropolar parameter, Reynolds number, Richardson number, Darcy number, Hartmann number, and Prandtl number. It is observed that the shape of the inner circulating cell is elliptic when the lid is moving in the upward direction and fluid is clear (Newtonian fluid). It is also found that average Nusselt number in both cases increases with increasing Prandtl number, Richardson number, micropolar parameter, and Darcy number, whereas it decreases with increasing Hartmann number. Further, it achieves a maximum when the lid is moving in the downward direction, regardless of the choice of involved parameters. The numerical code is also validated with previous published results. The investigation of the current study is beneficial in porous heat exchangers, construction of triangular-shaped solar collectors, rigid crystal, polymeric fluid transport, etc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations45
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicNanofluid Flow and Heat TransferFrench-language works237,207