MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2801151659 · doi:10.3138/cjfs.9.1.30

A National “As Distinct from Departmental” Film Board, and the case of <i>Heritage</i>

2000· article· fr· W2801151659 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Blaine Allan

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Film Studies · 2000
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicCinema and Media Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesFilm industryArtPolitical scienceArt historyMovie theater

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Heritage fus l’une des dernières productions du Canadian Gorvernment Motion Picture Bureau, complétée alors que John Grierson préparait son rapport sur les activités cinématographiques du gouvernement canadien. La distribution de Heritage fus l’une des premières tâches de Grierson en tant que commissaire, ce qui exigea de lui qu’il suscite l’intérêt du secteur privé pour le cinéma financé par le secteur public et qu’il s’assure le concours d’organisations bénévoles comme le Canadian Film Committee. Le film ne servit pas seulement les intérêts nationalistes de Grierson, mais lui permit aussi de comprendre les relations interdépartementales qui allaient donner forme aux principes politiques à partir desquels l’Office nationale du film du Canada sera fondé.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.360
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Film StudiesSame topicCinema and Media StudiesFrench-language works237,207