O desenvolvimento do taekwondo como esporte paralímpico
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Para-taekwondo is the adaptation of the Olympic sport enabling the practice of people with physical and motor disabilities.In 2015, parataekwondo joined the Paralympic Movement and will make its debut at Tokyo 2020 Paralympic Games.Due to this recent trajectory, it is still not possible to find in the literature many scientific studies concerning para-taekwondo.Therefore, the aim of this study is to analyze the parataekwondo coaches' perspective regarding the evolution of the sport, since its genesis until the inclusion in the paralympic program.Seven taekwondo coaches, all male, with taekwondo graduation above 4th DAN, coming from Canada, Brazil, Mexico, Guatemala and Venezuela participated in this study.All coaches who participated in the study were part of the national teams of their countries and had more than ten years of experience within the sport.Through a semi-structured interview, questions were raised in order to understand the development of parataekwondo in the American Continent.The data were analyzed using the content analysis method proposed by Bardin (2002).It was possible to conclude that the new parasport is still in a stage of constant development, even after establishing itself as a paralympic sport.Concerning this matter, it is essential that actions aiming the improvement of the professional training for all the coaches and professionals who are involved in the area are implemented, resulting in a better work towards people with disabilities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".