Flotow, Luise von (Org.). <em>Translating Women</em>. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press, 2011, & Farzaneh Farahzad; Luise von Flotow (Org.). <em>Translating Women</em>: Different Voices and New Horizons. Routledge: New York, 2017.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dentre os trabalhos na intersecção dos Estudos da Tradução com os Estudos de Gênero, as duas publicações sob título de Translating Women representam ótimos exemplos da aplicabilidade e aprofundamento teórico dos temas abordados por esse campo de estudos. Se o primeiro volume (2011) trouxe uma grande variedade de enfoques, o segundo (2017) foi uma reação positiva às críticas feitas ao primeiro, trazendo trabalhos de fora do eixo América do Norte — Europa, efetivamente abrindo novos horizontes e percebendo a importância dos contextos locais e suas próprias teorias para poder estabelecer uma rede de feminismo transnacional.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".