Interrogation of biosynthetic pathways of the cruciferous phytoalexins nasturlexins with isotopically labelled compounds
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The discovery of the first non-indolyl cruciferous phytoalexins nasturlexins A and B together with cyclonasturlexin and brassinin, all chemical defenses of watercress plants (Nasturtium officinale R. Br.), revealed the co-occurrence of two parallel defense pathways, the tryptophan (Trp) pathway and the phenylalanine (Phe) pathway in crucifers. Similar to watercress, winter cress (Barbarea vulgaris R. Br.) and upland cress [B. verna (P. Mill.) Aschers] produce Phe derived phytoalexins, the nasturlexins C and D together with their counterpart sulfoxides. A detailed chemical understanding of the biosynthetic pathways of these phytoalexins facilitates their metabolic engineering. To this end, the biosynthetic pathways of cyclonasturlexin, nasturlexins A-D and corresponding sulfoxides in cress plants were investigated using isotopically labelled compounds. Except for the carbon atom of the thiomethyl groups of nasturlexins, the origin of all carbon atoms and nitrogen of nasturlexins was established to be homophenylalanine. A detailed map of the biosynthetic intermediates between phenylethyl isothiocyanates and nasturlexins A-D and sulfoxides in upland cress, winter cress and watercress is proposed. An application beyond these findings could lead to "designer crops" containing a wider range of chemical defenses that could make such crops more resistant to pests and diseases, a greatly advantageous trait.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".