MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2801225405 · doi:10.1139/tcsme-2003-0004

MULTISTAGE PRODUCTION WITH PROBABILISTIC DEMAND AND FINITE RESOURCE CAPACITY

2003· article· en· W2801225405 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Chun‐Hsiung Lan, Miao-Sheng Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProduction (economics)Probabilistic logicComputer scienceSensitivity (control systems)Mathematical optimizationKey (lock)Resource (disambiguation)WorkstationOperations researchPlan (archaeology)EngineeringMathematicsEconomicsMicroeconomicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A mathematical model to reach the optimal multistage production undergoing the considerations of probabilistic market demand, finite resource capacity of each stage, related costs, sales price, and unreliable machines is developed in this paper. This research is practically applicable to evaluate the optimal production quantity in reducing the risk of future uncertainty. In addition, candidate cases, totally non-synchronous and at least two adjacent workstations with synchronous production, as well as their optimal solutions are also suggested. Moreover, the sensitivity analyses on key parameters of the optimal solution for each case are comprehensively presented. In sum, this study provides a dynamic tool capable of controlling the multistage production plan under the future uncertainty at any time for the production planners with profound insight.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.173
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical EngineeringSame topicAdvanced Manufacturing and Logistics OptimizationFrench-language works237,207