MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2801232872 · doi:10.1139/tcsme-2017-0039

Formation mechanism and prediction of plane shape in angular rolling of aluminum alloy thick plate

2018· article· en· W2801232872 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Pujun Hao, Anrui He, Wenquan Sun

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetallurgy and Material Forming
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParallelogramFinite element methodPlane (geometry)Enhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionAngular velocityMaterials scienceAluminiumProcess (computing)Point (geometry)Mathematical modelGeometryMechanicsPhysicsOpticsStructural engineeringClassical mechanicsMathematicsEngineeringComposite materialComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A finite element model (FEM) was developed to study the plane shape of an aluminum alloy thick plate after angular rolling. Results show that the plane shape is a parallelogram after the first pass of angular rolling. When the angular rolling process is completed after a second pass, the plane shape becomes symmetric about the center lines in both length and width directions. The width increases more at the edge that enters the deformation zone earlier. Next, a mathematical model to predict plane shape after angular rolling was proposed based on a sectional calculation method. By simulating the longitudinal rolling process, spreads from different plate widths were obtained and used in the mathematical model. By comparing these results with results from the FEM, the accuracy of the mathematical model was verified. Because of its short calculation time, the mathematical model can be used in practice during the production process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.524
Threshold uncertainty score0.369

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical EngineeringSame topicMetallurgy and Material FormingFrench-language works237,207