Effects of gravity on the thermo-hydrodynamics of moving contact lines
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we demonstrate the effects of gravity on the interfacial thermo-hydrodynamics as modulated by the patterned wettability gradients placed on the surfaces of a narrow fluidic channel. We investigate the dynamics of contact line motion of two-component incompressible immiscible liquid mixtures under the framework of a thermodynamically consistent phase field model. We validate our model with the experimental results available in the literature in the purview of thermocapillary-actuated microscale transport. We show that the gravity-induced forces in the presence of the thermocapillarity effect play a unique role on the interfacial dynamics at small scales, leading to a uniform movement of the interface in the channel, and offer a greater degree of controllability in the filling/wetting rate in the capillary. We show that the change in patch width, placed on the walls of the channel, leads to a change in the filling dynamics into the capillary. Also, we investigate the rate of different dissipations during the movement of the contact line along the channel and show that the kinetic energy modulated dissipation provides maximum energy to the motion of the contact line.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".