“Which Way You Goin’ Billy?”: Masculinity, Genre, and Self-Reflexivity in Hard Core Logo
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans cet article, j’explore le thème de la masculinité dans le « rockumentaire » Hard Core Logo, réalisé par Bruce McDonald en 1996. Plus précisément, j’examine comment McDonald puise dans deux genres, le road movie et le pastiche de documentaire (documenteur) pour explorer la socialité des hommes entre eux ainsi que la valeur accordée par ceux-ci à la domination. J’analyse d’abord le film comme un road movie et j’examine les relations entre les membres du groupe punk Hard Core Logo. Je porte une attention spéciale sur la relation entre le guitariste Billy Talent et le chanteur Joe Dick, amitié homoérotique et possiblement homosexuelle, mais aussi caractérisée par le désir de domination de Joe envers Billy. Ensuite, je porte mon attention sur la relation entre le personnage fictif du réalisateur et le groupe ; cette relation est aussi caractérisée par une volonté de domination. Je propose de considérer que parce qu’il s’inspire de plusieurs genres et qu’il utilise divers modes de réflexivité et d’intertextualité, Hard Core Logo offre une critique convaincante de certaines normes masculines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.020 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".