MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2801404419 · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsy061.1040

1041 Poor Adherence and Suboptimal Response to PAP Therapy in Epilepsy

2018· article· en· W2801404419 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Véronique Latreille, Ellen J. Bubrick, Milena Pavlova

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEpilepsy research and treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEpilepsyObstructive sleep apneaContinuous positive airway pressurePositive airway pressureApneaInternal medicineSleep apneaPediatricsAnesthesiaPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is common in epilepsy patients, and treatment adherence issues are confronted daily. Positive airway pressure (PAP) adherence may be even more challenging for epilepsy patients than those who are healthy, but this has not been examined systematically. This study investigated whether epilepsy patients with comorbid OSA are more likely to be nonadherent to PAP therapy than adults with OSA but without epilepsy. This retrospective study included 23 epilepsy patients diagnosed with OSA and a group of 23 control subjects who did not have epilepsy but were matched for age, sex, and severity of OSA. All participants started PAP treatment, and subject’s adherence was continuously recorded electronically, including hours and days of use, pressure received, and any residual respiratory events. Comparisons were made at 1-month, 3-month, and 1-year following PAP initiation, and predictors to poor adherence were evaluated. Patients with epilepsy were less adherent to PAP than OSA control subjects during the 1-year follow-up period, with the most prominent difference in adherence rates seen at 1-month (13% versus 78%, p=0.007). During this first month interval, average PAP use was lower in epilepsy patients (4.7 ± 2.1 hours) relative to controls (6.1 ± 1.2 hours, p=0.01). Despite sustained PAP use, epilepsy patients had a greater residual apnea/hypopnea index (AHI) at all study endpoints and were five times more likely than controls to have residual apnea events above normal range (≥5 event/hour). However, no clinical characteristics could significantly predict poor PAP adherence in patients. Epilepsy patients are less likely to be adherent to PAP therapy, as compared to adults with OSA. Moreover, PAP therapy could not sufficiently reduce AHI in up to 72% of patients. These findings highlight the need for careful monitoring of PAP use in epilepsy patients, as untreated OSA may worsen seizure burden. Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicEpilepsy research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207