Investigation of Biologically Stable Biofilter Medium for Methane Mitigation by Methanotrophic Bacteria
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study investigates the use of biologically stable materials including lava rock and biochar as alternative biofilter materials to common biodegradable materials such as compost. The results from batch studies indicate that lava rock and biochar can support the growth of methanotrophs for the oxidation of CH4 to CO2 with peak oxidation rates of more than 44 g (CH4)/h·m3 matrix. A statistical analysis of water content, media composition, and nitrogen determines that the level of nitrogen supplementation is the most important factor for CH4 oxidation. Nitrogen additions of up to 191 g (N)/m3 matrix maximize oxidation activity but concentrations above this value inhibit activity. The dominant methanotrophs belong to the genera Methylobacter and Methylomicrobium and maintain a steady relative abundance even as CH4 oxidation rates decrease. This indicates that the methanotrophs likely enter into a starvation phase (or a stationary phase of growth in which the population may cease to divide but remains metabolically active) in response to unfavorable nitrogen conditions, and their CH4 oxidation activities eventually recover as toxic NH3/NO3 intermediates are further oxidized during nitrogen metabolism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".