MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2801410951 · doi:10.1002/jcb.26764

Evaluation of 4‐bp insertion/deletion polymorphism within the 3′UTR of SGSM3 in bladder cancer using mismatch PCR‐RFLP method: A preliminary report

2018· article· en· W2801410951 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammad Hashemi, Gholamreza Bahari, Fatemeh Bizhani, Hiva Danesh, Shamim Sarhadi, Seyed Amir Mohsen Ziaee, Abbas Basiri, Behzad Narouie, Mohsen Taheri, Saeid Ghavami

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cellular Biochemistry · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersZahedan University of Medical Sciences
KeywordsBladder cancerGenotypeAlleleRestriction fragment length polymorphismBiologyUntranslated regionPolymorphism (computer science)OncologyInternal medicineGeneticsMolecular biologyMedicineCancerGeneCancer researchMessenger RNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The small G protein signaling modulator 3 (SGSM3) has been shown to be associated with small G-protein-coupled receptor signaling. There is little data regarding the impact of SGSM3 polymorphisms on cancer risk. In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the impact of 4-bp insertion/deletion (rs56228771) polymorphism in the 3'UTR of SGSM3 and susceptibility to bladder cancer in a sample of the Iranian population. This case-control study included 143 pathologically confirmed bladder cancer patients and 144 healthy subjects. The SGSM3 4-bp ins/del (rs56228771) variant was determined by mismatch PCR-RFLP. The findings showed that ins/del genotype and ins allele of SGSM3 4-bp ins/del polymorphism significantly increased the risk of bladder cancer (OR = 3.11, 95%CI = 1.70-5.71, P < 0.0001 and OR = 2.11, 95%CI = 1.27-3.52, P = 0.004, respectively). Our findings support an association between 4-bp ins/del polymorphism in the 3'UTR of SGSM3 and the risk of bladder cancer in an Iranian population. Additional studies with larger sample sizes and diverse ethnicities are warranted to establish if such an association exists in general.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.495

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cellular BiochemistrySame topicEpigenetics and DNA MethylationFrench-language works237,207