Effect of temperature on behaviour of red clay–structure interface
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study presents the results of an experimental investigation conducted to assess the temperature effects on shear stress–strain behaviour and shear strength parameters of red clay and its interface with the geostructure under different normal stresses (50, 100, 200, and 400 kPa). A modified direct shear test apparatus, capable of handling temperatures up to 50 °C, was used in this study. The experimental program includes shearing the red clay and red clay–structure interface at different temperatures (2, 15, 38 °C) and after subjecting it to different heating–cooling cycles. The test results in this study and the previous studies in the literature indicated that the temperature has insignificant effects on the friction angle of clay and clay–structure interface. However, the temperature effect on the cohesion of clay and the adhesion between the clay and structure depends on the normal stress level and history. A new conceptual understanding for the possible temperature effect on the clay–structure interface was introduced in this study and it was used to interpret the different interface test results in the literature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".