VIBRATIONS OF A ROTOR SYSTEM WITH MULTIPLE COUPLER OFFSETS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, a transfer matrix method (TMM) for rotors with multiple coupler offsets was derived. The studies showed the coupler’s stiffness altered the rotor’s critical speeds but offset caused additional external excitation. The cases of two offsets in- and anti-phase in a typical rotor were given as examples. In the in-phase case, significantly increased response amplitude occurred at lower rotational speed and the increase was linearly proportional to the offset value. As to the anti-phase case, the increased response was insignificant, implying an opposite offset would cancel out a major response of the previous offset. The whirling orbits before and after the offset couplers were also illustrated. The results, as expected, showed the in-phase offset displayed much larger radii than the anti-phase’s. The rotor’s orbits changed the whirling direction once the rotation fell within a certain range and this feature seemed to be unaffected by coupler offsets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".