Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, a guided-wave structure, the half-mode composite waveguide (HMCW) is proposed and presented. Similar to the conventional mode composite waveguide (MCW), the HMCW also has an inner and outer waveguides, each working in its half-mode operation, respectively. In the HMCW structure, the signal propagates in the inner waveguide with quasi-TE <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">0.5-0</sub> mode and along the outer waveguide with the quasi-TEM mode. The HMCW's half-mode operation principle, impedance, loss, and propagation characteristics including higher order modes are analyzed. Compared to its full-size counterpart, the HMCW only occupies half the space, when operating within the same frequency band. Simulation results show that the transmission loss of the HMCW is comparable to that of the full-size MCW. Thus, it is also suitable for both lowand high-frequency design and applications. To measure and integrate the HMCW with other planar circuits, a joint feeding network for the HMCW is also proposed. Its circuit prototype is fabricated on three layers of substrate using a multilayer substrate integration technique. This joint feeding network can simultaneously excite the inner and outer waveguides, respectively, in an independent manner. In measurements, both the inner and outer waveguides are transitioned to microtrip lines, and a good matching is achieved from 4.4 to 11.2 GHz with a relative bandwidth of 87.2% for the outer waveguide at low frequency and from 18.6 to 32.6 GHz with a relative bandwidth of 54.7% for the inner waveguide at high frequency, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".