MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2801536302 · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsy061.893

0894 The Role of Age, Sex, Race/ethnicity, Education, and Marital Status in the Relationship of Chronic Health Conditions and Habitual Sleep Duration

2018· article· en· W2801536302 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaowen Ji, Michael A. Grandner, Megan E. Petrov

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMarital statusMedicineDepression (economics)Sleep (system call)DemographyRisk factorPopulationSocioeconomic statusGerontologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aims to investigate the associations between diagnosis history of chronic conditions and habitual sleep duration, and the role of sociodemographic factors in-between the associations. 2013 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System was used. Multinomial regressions were performed to investigate the risk for extreme sleep durations among those with depression or chronic diseases. Stratified regression analyses were further done to investigate the interactions of sociodemographic variable and depression/chronic diseases on habitual sleep durations. Among 491,773 respondents, most diagnoses were associated with suboptimal sleep durations except skin cancer. In general, the risk for very short sleep duration is higher than that for short and long sleep durations across the diagnoses and groups. Age, sex, education level, race and marital status significantly moderated the relationship between the diagnosis history and extreme sleep durations. Moreover, with depression or arthritis, people in younger age group were more likely to report very short sleep durations than the older group. Men are more likely to report very short sleep duration than women if they had depression. Yet, females are more likely to report very short sleep duration than males if they had the diagnosis of physical diseases. Higher education was associated with lower risk for very short sleep duration in depression, but the trend reversed for heart diseases. For white population, the associations between diagnosis and extreme sleep durations were significant across all chronic conditions. In contrast, black people are less like to have long sleep durations if they had the previous diagnosis of pulmonary diseases, asthma, and arthritis. Sociodemographic factors significantly moderated the relationship between previous chronic illness and sleep duration extremes. Nature of the chronic conditions and social-economic status may account for the discrepancies in medical diagnosis-sleep duration associations. Further study was required to understand sleep duration, as a health behavior, in the context of antecedent chronic conditions. none.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score0.225

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicCardiovascular Health and Risk FactorsFrench-language works237,207