MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2801577336 · doi:10.1049/iet-epa.2017.0759

Design and torque capability of a ducted rotor brushless doubly fed reluctance machine

2018· article· en· W2801577336 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Electric Power Applications · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Motor Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMagnetic reluctanceTorqueRotor (electric)Switched reluctance motorMachine designControl theory (sociology)Control engineeringReluctance motorDirect torque controlComputer scienceMachine controlEngineeringControl (management)MagnetMechanical engineeringInduction motorArtificial intelligencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study discusses the design strategy and response analysis of the brushless doubly fed reluctance machine (BDFRM) with an aim of commercially feasible implementation with satisfactory performance. In this regard, basic operation theory is reviewed, and a control strategy is proposed to maximise the motor torque capability. A BDFRM design is proposed and simulated for investigation. Subsequently, a prototype machine is built and tested. Predicted simulation torque data is compared with the actual machine data to evaluate the design approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.901
Threshold uncertainty score0.737

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it