MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2801588865 · doi:10.7202/1044159ar

Actualité et transformations de la Fête des morts chez les Kaingang du Brésil méridional

2018· article· fr· W2801588865 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Robert R. Crépeau, Rogério Reus Gonçalves da Rosa

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontières · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban and sociocultural dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La vie rituelle des Kaingang, une société amérindienne du Brésil, est caractérisée par la célébration d’un rite de secondes funérailles, nommé Kikikoi, que ces derniers associent explicitement à la représentation de leur identité amérindienne ainsi qu’à la revendication de leurs droits constitutionnels et territoriaux. À la suite de fortes pressions externes, sa réalisation fut interrompue pendant près de vingt-cinq ans. Sa reprise en 1976 lui donna un second souffle qui dura un peu plus d’une trentaine d’années jusqu’en 1999. Depuis le début du présent millénaire, la réalisation de ce rite fait l’objet de vives discussions au sein de diverses communautés Kaingang où une partie grandissante de la population convertie au pentecôtisme s’oppose à sa réalisation en invoquant notamment l’importante consommation de boisson fermentée qu’il implique. Ses réalisations récentes ont fait l’objet de divers aménagements tenant compte des dynamiques politiques et religieuses locales. Dans cet article, nous décrivons et analysons cette actualisation récente du Kikikoi en regard des nouvelles dynamiques sociales auxquelles est confrontée la culture kaingang.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.078
Threshold uncertainty score0.155

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.005
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontièresSame topicUrban and sociocultural dynamicsFrench-language works237,207