Fragment‐Based Phenotypic Lead Discovery: Cell‐Based Assay to Target Leishmaniasis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A rapid and practical approach for the discovery of new chemical matter for targeting pathogens and diseases is described. Fragment-based phenotypic lead discovery (FPLD) combines aspects of traditional fragment-based lead discovery (FBLD), which involves the screening of small-molecule fragment libraries to target specific proteins, with phenotypic lead discovery (PLD), which typically involves the screening of drug-like compounds in cell-based assays. To enable FPLD, a diverse library of fragments was first designed, assembled, and curated. This library of soluble, low-molecular-weight compounds was then pooled to expedite screening. Axenic cultures of Leishmania promastigotes were screened, and single hits were then tested for leishmanicidal activity against intracellular amastigote forms in infected murine bone-marrow-derived macrophages without evidence of toxicity toward mammalian cells. These studies demonstrate that FPLD can be a rapid and effective means to discover hits that can serve as leads for further medicinal chemistry purposes or as tool compounds for identifying known or novel targets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it