Implantation et évaluation d’un programme de formation sur la lecture interactive destiné à des parents d’enfants de maternelle 5 ans
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article présente une recherche quasi expérimentale qui avait pour but d’implanter et d’évaluer, auprès de 59 parents d’enfants de maternelle 5 ans du Québec, un programme de formation sur l’exploitation de la littérature jeunesse pour favoriser, entre autres, le développement langagier des enfants. Le programme, intitulé Les mille et un plaisirs de lire avec toi, visait à encourager les parents à fournir un soutien de qualité à leur enfant lors de la lecture interactive d’albums. Afin d’assurer ce soutien, des ateliers de formation leur ont été offerts et des trousses littéraires ont circulé dans les familles pendant six mois. Cet article décrit la recherche à laquelle ont pris part les parents et présente les résultats qui révèlent que le programme a contribué à les sensibiliser à l'importance de la lecture interactive et à celle de susciter des interactions de qualité lors de l'animation de ce type d'activité.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.017 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".