MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2801661682 · doi:10.1109/tie.2018.2835371

Asymmetrical Ride-Through and Grid Support in Converter-Interfaced DG Units Under Unbalanced Conditions

2018· article· en· W2801661682 on OpenAlexaff
Masoud M. Shabestary, Yasser Abdel‐Rady I. Mohamed

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVoltageGridScheme (mathematics)EngineeringVoltage regulationDistributed generationControl theory (sociology)Electronic engineeringComputer scienceReliability engineeringElectrical engineeringRenewable energyMathematicsControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Increasing penetration level of distributed generation (DG) units necessitates their participation in supporting power system stability and providing ancillary services. This paper highlights the necessity of supporting the connection voltage by these units under short-term unbalanced voltage sags. To address this, a new regulation scheme, named asymmetrical ride-through (ART), is proposed in this paper. The proposed scheme enforces DG units to properly regulate the voltage within the dynamic limits for three important voltage parameters: positive sequence, negative sequence, and phase voltage magnitude. The main advantages of applying the ART scheme are avoiding unnecessary outages due to temporary unbalanced faults and enhancing the grid stability. As the second contribution, an advanced dynamic voltage support method is also proposed to accurately address the specifications determined in the ART scheme. The successful results of the ART regulation scheme and the proposed dynamic voltage support method are verified using simulation and experimental test cases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations66
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Industrial ElectronicsSame topicMicrogrid Control and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207