MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2801686530 · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsy061.916

0917 Finasteride is Associated with a Higher Odds of Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA): Results from the US FDA Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS)

2018· article· en· W2801686530 on OpenAlexaff
Madhulika A. Gupta, Branka Vujčić, Alison D. Sheridan, Aditya K. Gupta

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObstructive sleep apneaAdverse Event Reporting SystemMedicineFinasterideAdverse effectOddsPolysomnographyOdds ratioSleep apneaInternal medicineApneaLogistic regression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Finasteride is 5α-reductase inhibitor that is FDA approved for the treatment of benign prostatic hypertrophy and androgenetic alopecia in men. Free testosterone is converted by 5α-reductase to the more potent androgen 5α-dihydrotestosterone. Finasteride, which crosses the blood-brain barrier, therefore lowers overall androgen activity. A decrease in androgen levels has been associated with OSA and lower sleep efficiency in some studies. Recently the ‘post-finasteride syndrome’ (PFS) consisting of sexual difficulties, several neurologic/psychologic symptoms and insomnia has been recognized. To our knowledge there are no reports of OSA with finasteride. The FAERS database (January 1, 2004-June 30, 2017, total count of individual safety reports or ISR =9,553,117) was used to examine ISR of OSA and insomnia where finasteride was documented as the primary suspect. Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) preferred terms (PTs) were used to select ISRs designating OSA (PT [MedDRA code] Sleep apnoea syndrome [10040979]) and Insomnia (PT [MedDRA code] included Insomnia [10022437], Initial insomnia [10022035], Middle insomnia [10027590], and Terminal Insomnia [10068932]) as the adverse event (AE). Reporting odds ratios (ROR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to assess baseline risk of OSA and insomnia when finasteride was used for any indication versus the risk of OSA and insomnia with all other medications in FAERS used for any indication. All ISRs where data on sex was available (89/145) involved males; age was coded in only 3/145 ISRs. The odds of OSA with finasteride for any indication versus OSA with all other medication in FAERS used for any indication revealed ROR=5.73(95% CI 4.86–6.75, z=20.866, p<0.0001); Count of ISR: 145 OSA/61,490 all other AE with finasteride versus 11,390 OSA/27,680,268 all other AE with all other medications in FAERS. Similarly for Insomnia ROR=1.72 (95% CI 1.59–1.87, z=13.013, p<0.0001). Finasteride was associated with a significantly higher odds of OSA, a finding that has not been previously reported. The higher odds of insomnia with finasteride is consistent with the previously reported PFS. None.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.111
Threshold uncertainty score0.573

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicNeurogenetic and Muscular Disorders ResearchFrench-language works237,207